Who was Che Guevara and for what purpose?
Who was Che Guevara and for what purpose?
Berentos ordered his army to kill Guevara. These orders were not his but actually his American masters. Those who had long ago set the price for the head of his greatest enemy. The CIA and other Special Forces arrived in Bolivia to inform them of the "location" and to oversee the operation. The American adviser arrived in Bolivia on April 29 and a 19-day "guerrilla force" training camp for the Bolivian Army Second Ranger Battalion. Applied - This was an emergency training program in which soldiers were to use weapons, compete individually, with squadrons. Atun training, patrolling and formed a special battalion of Rangers trained gyy.an kind of special training available marmkany the enemy, which was the essence of the land.
The tracking of guerrilla footprints began in late September. The special forces of Bolivia were informed of the presence of an informant. They cordoned off the area on October 8 and then after a minor skirmish. Chi Guevara was arrested. As the army surrounds him, it is said that Chi told him, "Do not kill me, I will eat more live than dead for you." It is an attempt to show that he was a less courageous and cowardly human being. This is in fact part of the same malicious campaign of the enemies of the revolution through which Greater ideals such as Chi are trying to get a nickname on the valley to dilute its impact and dissolve its identity. He was a man who always lived with courage and courage and who never cared about his life.
Upon receiving the news of Chi's arrest, President Burntus did not delay a moment in issuing an order to kill him. He did not feel the need to demonstrate the civilization of the requirements of justice. He issued his order with full knowledge of Washington and Ashland. Not all of them were ready to sue Chi Guevara for hearing his statement. In which he defended himself, he rebelled. Reality and legitimacy, and exposing the injustice and inequality that made him inclined to be rebellious. Instead of hearing that kind of voice, he always nails it. It was decided to kill.
Junkers who arrested Rosalzburg and Carl Lebkhant in Berlin, Germany, in January 1919, did not have the time to present them in court. These tyrants also had a foothold in a law book before they were killed. Not trying to appease the demands. Guevara was arrested and taken to a nearby school building in a nearby village of La Higuera. He was kept overnight. In his mind what he did last night and how. How will ideas emerge? A child of a sheep trapped in a flock of wolves!
Chi was brought out of the school building the next day after noon. It was October 9, 1967, when Chi was shot by a Sergeant Marutiran, a 1.10-year-old sergeant. His legs to ensure his death and to ensure his death. I was shot numerous times so that he would not die of wounds. He said to his killers before he died, "I know you have come to kill me. You are only killing a human being. "These are the words that can be the words of a true Chi Guevara. The person begging for life may have it but not Chi Guevara.
His body was taken by helicopter to Vallegrande, a nearby hospital, and decorated in a laundry tub of a hospital so that press photographers could take his photographs. An Army doctor in Shakespeare's mausoleum acted on his own during the surgical procedure. Cut off his hand, so did Bolivia's military officers who took Che Guevara's body to an unknown location. The man who was assigned to blow up Guevara's head was Felix Rodriguez Felix Rodriguez, He was a CIA agent. He was involved in a conspiracy attack on Bay of Pigs to crush Castro's rebellion in Cuba. He was responsible for sharing the good news of Che Guevara's death to his masters in Virginia and Washington. He also took possession of his personal belongings, and later he showed them all to the photographer. Like every person with the absurd psychology of filing his name in history, Felix did the same. Opportunity to get rich for your fame. But the person who tried to kill and kill these people killed him. It was to be, he was and is today the world was the poor soul who has become an issue of rights for victims of war. He was a revolutionary hero, and jdujhdkylyy lives of international socialism willed Shaheed.
The question of guerrilla warfare.
Like every other human being in the world, Che Guevara had many positive aspects as well. There were also many weak aspects. He undoubtedly tried to make the Cuban model's guerrilla warfare tactics his own. The Marxists have always regarded the armed struggle of the peasantry as a source of support for the rule of the working class. First of all, this position was coined by Karl Marx during the German Revolution in 1848. When he declared that the German Revolution was just that It can only be conquered if this farmer becomes the second succession of the war. This meant that the laborers of the cities would have to join the peasants of the villages. It is by no means correct to say that this position is only for modern societies. Even before the Russian Revolution, the working class was only 10% of Russia's total population. Yet, Lenin and the Bolsheviks There was a vow that the working class would lead the nation and join the peasants and other layers along with it. In the Russian Revolution, the proletariat played a leading role and with it millions of devout peasants joined their struggle in this struggle. The real allies of the proletariat.
If any section of society can make a real socialist revolution possible, then it is the only and only working class. It has no emotional explanation, it is because of its quality and position in the society. Doing so makes it important to have a collective role in the production process. There is no indication in any of the writings of Mark Engels Lennon and Trotsky that the peasants can carry out the task of creating a socialist revolution. It is that the peasants are not collective in their class status. They are divided into several layers. From proletarians (from proletarians) to kabir peasants who work for wages to laborers, everyone joins the farmers. Since they do not have a common purpose and interests, they cannot play any independent role in society. Historically, they have been supporting many different groups of cities.
But in its nature, guerrilla warfare has been the classic method of peasant struggle. It has never been the norm of the working class. In the jungle mountains and in places where access is extremely difficult, this method is being used. Due to this, the regular army faces considerable difficulties in transporting such areas while the guerrillas provide assistance and support to the local rural population. This makes them easier to operate. A backward and peasant majority. In a populous country, the revolutionary struggle for the working class in the guerrilla warfare works The border process can be helpful and effective. But it never occurred to Lenin that guerrilla warfare was an alternative to the conscious struggle of the workers. From a Marxist point of view, the guerrilla system was aided and abetted by the socialist revolution. The same can be done otherwise.
This position was taken by Lenin in 1905, with Narodnaya Volya Narudania and his colleagues in the Social Revolutionary Party taking a position on individual terrorism in this regard has nothing to do with Lenin's stance. The "guerrilla" arrangements in the cities are adopted. All of these are in stark contrast to Lenin's true position. Lenin has always emphasized that armed struggle has to be subordinated to the People's Revolutionary movement at all times. Even in such situations when it allows;
1) There is a matter of handling public anger.
2. The labor movement in the particular area may require any such requirement.
3. Make sure that it does not provoke the workers and their strength does not weaken.
And above all, Lenin emphasized that the guerrilla warfare should only be allowed to operate at a time when the labor movement had reached such a point that it could rebel. Whether cut off or unconnected with labor intensities, the chances of its decline and fall are strongly present. In the period after 1906, when the movement was weakened and the revolutionaries suffered from one series of defeats and heavy losses. , The performance of the guerrilla organizations was making it clear that they were not capable of acting as a tool of the Revolutionary Party. It was promoting the adventures and causing a lot of damage. Even at a point when guerrillas were talking in favor of war, this method could be used to counter the attacks of the Revolution, and In order to save the revolutionary movement, Lenin called for avoiding the dangers of ancient terrorism, anarchy, blancism, and hatred grief, at all costs. And Lenin also said that my position was being verified by newspaper reports.
During the period 1905/6, the guerrilla system became a part of the revolutionary movement. Snatching, disarming, etc. were all part of the armed struggle. But all these fighter squads were linked to other organizations and worked under them. The military committee was not based solely on the members of the RSDLP but also included SRs, tradesmen (printers) and students. As we have seen, specific squads were formed to compete with the black centurion and other bullying groups. They protected the meetings of the workers and the revolutionaries from the police raids. Ruku was instrumental in preventing them. His other goals included acquiring weapons, destroying spies and police touts, and attacking banks for funds. Workers themselves formed such guerrilla groups. The Bolsheviks tried to take over the leadership of these groups so that they could be converted into a systematic and regular force and armed and equipped with clear plans. There were, of course, many serious implications. Campaigners, low-minded, and narrow-minded, could join these groups. In the weakening phase of the movement They could engage in criminal activity and indulge in bullying.
Depending on whether the conspirators were also participating in it, it is a well-known principle that it is easier to interfere with state agencies' personnel or spies within terrorist or armed organizations. Nevertheless, a true revolutionary party whose cadres have always been linked to each other armed with educated ideology, even if such an organization is not devoid of state bureaucracy, which we will mention later.
Lenin was fully aware of the presence of armed groups and the dangers of fallout caused by them. With the strong discipline and strong control of party organizations and experienced cadres, such tendencies were largely controlled. But the greatest and true control was, of course, the patriarchy. As long as the guerrilla units continued to act as supporters of the mass movement, that is, in the state of revolutionary emergence, they undoubtedly served useful and useful results. The guerrilla units cut off from them, separated from the patriarchy, they suffered the worst fall. He refused to be a permanent or continuous manifestation. When it was convinced that the movement had now begun to inevitably return to decline, Lenin immediately ordered an immediate dissolution of all such guerrilla groups. ۔
Guerrilla War
Che Guevara has authored numerous articles and books on the intellectual and practical aspects of guerrilla warfare. His experience of crushing the Arabian government in Cuba made unmistakable impressions on him. And that assumption was true. All human history testifies that the ruling classes never gave up power without a fight. No devil ever gave up his palm and gave himself to you. There is simply no stumbling block. People have to get on the field to fight in every situation, How is the midwife of history in terms of the strength of the ruling class aktyarkrnahuga sktahu.marks be weak, unarmed and failed.
In his famous book Guerrilla Warfare, Che Guevara describes the model of the Cuban revolution as a torchlight for the rest of the world, that this method can be used everywhere.
In his famous book Guerrilla Warfare, Che Guevara describes the Cuban Revolution model as a torchlight for the rest of the world, a method that can be used everywhere. It is a model in which a small group of insurgents (revolutionary people) Understands the need to partner and be part of organizations, and understands the overthrow of unarmed struggles. This is a very serious and dangerous misunderstanding, as subsequent events appear to confirm its endorsement. - Cuba's event was so sudden and so sudden for the imperialists. It was not that these guerrillas would succeed so quickly and so easily. Even when these guerrillas were successful, Washingtonians did not understand what to do and what not to do. One faction was urging the other to act with caution and patience, the other carefully and patiently. A rash of mistakes and mistakes was made from the community, but later they learned a lesson from it. After this horrific experience of Cuba, He could not tolerate any other kind of imperfection and error. He studied the guerrilla method as a special one, including the writings of Che Guevara himself. Now he was clever and alert, but now They were waiting for something like this to happen. The first guerrilla group that was formed after Cuba was immediately crushed. Guerrillas that they can take this opportunity to open up the foundations of their support for Imdad in remote rural areas. This is what we see happening in Bolivia. This imperial dictatorship determined not only the fate of Chi Guevara and its allies, but also of the later revolutionary guerrillas.
It is one of the most tragic aspects of the history of the Revolution that, by adopting this model of Cuba, many enthusiastic and true revolutionaries of Latin America and many other countries of the world, many of whom were young, lost their lives. This method was successful in Cuba because of the specific circumstances of this country. Successful methods in a particular country do not necessarily produce the same results in another country, where conditions are different from the first country. A far-flung backward agricultural country. As I was in China in 1949, the guerrilla warfare seemed reasonable in some respects. But in countries like Chile or Argentina where the majority of the population lives in cities and in a minority, this is nothing but rash and terrible error. Until we see that Lenin even in the era of Czarros. He emphasized that the proletariat will have to entrust the leadership of the revolutionary movement. And the guerrilla process should be used at all times under the control of the masses, especially the workers.
In other countries, including Argentina, Uruguay, Venezuela, and Mexico, the Cuban model of irony and deliberate imitation did not yield any results except for bloodshed by both the revolutionaries and the revolutionaries. And deadly - which is a new manifestation of ancient individual terrorism. Those advocating and employing this destructive method believe that they have created something unique and new to themselves. The fact is that they are doing nothing other than imitating the famous Russian terrorist Narodnaya Volya, against whom Lenin fought an unrelenting battle.
Using this method, no matter what the attempt, the worst bloody defeat and worst brutal reaction has resulted. If the commitment of the people to the revolutionary organizations and movement of the masses could have been very important and fruitful. This is a very deadly and corrupt strategy that must be destroyed if we Has made the socialist revolution possible and successful. This is a negative and inaccurate interpretation of Chi Guevara's identity. Is. Which is considered and imposed by a layer of ultra lifts on their own sacred duty. And those who lack the ability to fully comprehend this great true revolution and only make their own mistakes their own. And there can be nothing more wrong with the identity that these ultra-lifts are constantly dealing with.
Who was Che Guevara and for what purpose?
The true and pure message of Chi Guevara is that we should extract valuable lessons from the vast treasures of its internationalism. The true view that a socialist revolution cannot be the work and destiny of a single country, is merely a chain of global revolution. There is a link that is inevitable to be connected to all other links. What is happening in Latin America today fully confirms this true view of Chi.
Che Guevara's Internationalism.
The Cuban Revolution had been international since its inception. Gi گreira was the embodiment of the same spirit that was one of the most important leaders of the revolution. He was born in Argentina and did the revolution in Cuba. But he is, in fact, a true International and straightforward was the inhabitant of the "world". Like Simon Bolivar, he was also equipped with the context of the Latin American revolution. Since the martyrdom of Chi, constant efforts have been made to disarm him. To be presented as a poor man, he is being made a face that looks very much on the shirts. The bourgeoisie calls him a romantic hero, Oppressive Idealist and Don't Know What to Try to Make. This is nothing but a big and true revolutionary identity and a motif with a motive. He is just a hopeless, hopeless and dreaming of good days. He was not a human being, but rather a realistic revolutionary. It was by no means an accident or a coincidence that Che Guevara wanted to spread the revolution to other countries, he wanted to expand it to Africa and Latin America. He knew well and knew that the Cuban revolution only survived by spreading this revolution. Can and will remain.
The destiny of the Cuban revolution has been linked to global events and accidents since the very beginning. And perhaps this is why it is still saved, otherwise it would not have been possible for imperialism to have left it like that of the Russian Revolution. Also has a universal significance. It has had a global impact. Its echo was heard effectively, especially in the Caribbean and Latin countries. This is still the case. Chi sparked a spark that he thought could engulf the entire region. It may be that he was wrong about how to carry out the task, but his intention was No one can deny the truth and greatness of the intention and purpose of it. The truth of its basic ideology is still Muslim today. Chi provided ample support to those organizing revolutionary work outside Cuba but they all failed. The first of these was in Panama, while the second was in the Dominican Republic in early 1959. Unfortunately, the Cuban experience has led to some false lessons. The ghastly effects of the guerrilla war and the Cubos focos model were all understood as a catastrophic result, followed by a series of devastating defeats. There were several reasons, as we described earlier. Cuba's case for imperialism "suddenly" came out that he was not expecting it. In the end, imperialism was alerted and it crushed every new focos as soon as it was over. The main reason was that in Latin American countries a large part of the population lived in cities and towns. While guerrilla warfare was purely a rural procedure, Procedures always necessary for it to be adopted in accordance with the terms and requirements.
This is what we see in Venezuela. Where the guerrilla movement was exposed to the massacre. Venezuela's revolution is emerging as a civilian revolution. Its foundations are the focus of the city and its entire rural areas. Hugo Chavez's Bolivarian movement has effectively mobilized the people through parliamentary struggle. And it was the mobilization of the masses that has led to the defeat of the Revolution three times in a row. Have become connected and united with each other The failure of the Revolution in Venezuela will also mark the future of Cuba. This danger must be avoided at all times. But here we will learn lessons from history in every case. Of course, the Venezuelan revolution has shown miracles. But it is still not complete. Like the Cuban revolution, Venezuela's revolution began as a national democratic revolution. Chavez's initial plans and programs were the same as those of a progressive bourgeoisie, but history is a witness. That the real enemies of imperialism and elite democracy are going away. Anything less than killing the revolution. But they will not stop or rest. If attempts were made to keep the revolution limited to bourgeois democratic goals, in other words, no attempt could be made to prevent it from being destroyed.
Why did the US imperialists finally want to ruin Cuba and Venezuela's revolutions? That's because these revolutions are engulfing the entire region. The imperialists know that Cuba and Venezuela are becoming the centerpiece. Will do everything possible to eliminate it.
Che Guevara's program was to create 20 Vietnam in Latin America. It was not a bad idea at all. But it was not possible at that time. It is not because then the nature of the situation was not appropriate. The wrong model of guerrilla war has been adopted and adopted. But now much has changed. The organic crisis of the capitalist system is causing crisis throughout Latin America. And those who are leading the revolutionary situation are moving. Things are going to change everywhere - from Tierra del F uego to Rio Grande, there is no country like this. A stable capitalist government should be established. If there is a right leadership, there is no reason not to have a proletarian revolution in one or more of Latin America's countries in the coming days. What needs to be understood and avoided. Nationalism should not be made a goal with a reactionary bourgeoisie.
Comments
Post a Comment